🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The tobacco firm seeks modifications of a proposed legislation that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Recently, WHO officials raised concerns that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to less than half “according to global suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum twelve months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, suggesting that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The draft bill suggests penalties for various offences “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but asserts that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “undermine this law so much that the required influence for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We live in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my property and gather the crop and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator commented: “The corporation runs its activities following with applicable local laws. Additionally, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which allow for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The company was “not opposed to regulation”, the spokesperson stated, adding that minors should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to accomplish desired community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which encompasses growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.